Klingensmith, M. v. J.
This text of Klingensmith, M. v. J. (Klingensmith, M. v. J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL S. KLINGENSMITH, : No. 97 WM 2015 : Petitioner : : v. : : HONORABLE DEBRA A. PEZZE, JUDGE : WESTMORELAND COUNTY, : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is GRANTED to the
extent it seeks relief relative to the overdue transmittal of the record.
The Superior Court has issued three orders directing the Court of Common Pleas
of Westmoreland County to transmit the record relative to Petitioner’s pending appeal.
See Commonwealth v. Klingensmith, 1120 WDA 2013 (orders dated 4/28/2014;
11/05/2014; and 03/09/2015). The common pleas court has not complied. As such, the
Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County is DIRECTED to transmit the record
to the Superior Court within 15 days and provide notice to this Court of that transmittal.
Jurisdiction is RETAINED pending receipt of the notice that transmittal has
occurred.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption
and to serve this order on both the President Judge of the Superior Court and the
President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County.
Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Klingensmith, M. v. J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klingensmith-m-v-j-pa-2016.