Klingenschmitt v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 2015
Docket15-5050
StatusUnpublished

This text of Klingenschmitt v. United States (Klingenschmitt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klingenschmitt v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

GORDON J. KLINGENSCHMITT, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

2015-5050 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:11-cv-00723-EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN B. WELLS, Law Office of John B. Wells, Slidell, LA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MIKKI COTTET, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BRYANT G. SNEE; GRIFFIN FARRIS, Office of the Judge Advocate General, United States Navy, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Klingenschmitt v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klingenschmitt-v-united-states-cafc-2015.