Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield
25 A.2d 879, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 246
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Colie, Wells, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield, 25 A.2d 879, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1942).
25 A.2d 879 (Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.