Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield
25 A.2d 879, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 246
This text of 25 A.2d 879 (Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield, 25 A.2d 879, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1942).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Colie, Wells, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 A.2d 879, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klingel-v-town-of-bloomfield-nj-1942.