Klingbeil v. Board of Liquor Control

Ohio Court of Appeals

Klingbeil v. Board of Liquor Control

155 N.E.2d 527, 79 Ohio Law. Abs. 194, 1957 Ohio App. LEXIS 1013

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 7, 1957

DocketNo. 5662

StatusPublished

This text of 155 N.E.2d 527 (Klingbeil v. Board of Liquor Control) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klingbeil v. Board of Liquor Control, 155 N.E.2d 527, 79 Ohio Law. Abs. 194, 1957 Ohio App. LEXIS 1013 (Ohio Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT.

We have examined the record in this case and considered the assignments of error, briefs and oral arguments of counsel and are of the opinion that none of the assigned errors are well taken.

[195]*195Judge Leach, in a well-considered opinion, reviewed the legal questions presented and, in our opinion, came to the proper conclusion, that the order of the Board of Liquor Control was supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law. The judge of the Common Pleas Court had a right to draw the conclusions he did with reference to the chemical analysis and the presence of ethyl alcohol.

That circumstantial evidence may permit reasonable inferences and conclusions is sound law. See Ross, etc. v. Board of Liquor Control, 72 Abs 415, headnotes 1 and 2; also, Abdoney, etc. v. Board of Liquor Control, 72 Abs 513, headnote 2.

We adopt the opinion of Judge Leach and affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

PETREE, PJ, MILLER, J, concur. , HORNBECK, J, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI