Kling v. Tobias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kling v. Tobias

176 A.D. 947

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D. 947 (Kling v. Tobias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kling v. Tobias, 176 A.D. 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Held, there is a failure of proof that the person served with notice under the Stock Corporation Law (§ 69) was the treasurer or financial officer of the corporation at the time of service of the notice. 2. The proof shows that the plaintiff was not a stockholder in the corporation. (See Hapgoods v. Lusch, No. 1, 123 App. Div. 23.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Held, there is a failure of proof that the person served with notice under the Stock Corporation Law (§ 69) was the treasurer or financial officer of the corporation at the time of service of the notice. 2. The proof shows that the plaintiff was not a stockholder in the corporation. (See Hapgoods v. Lusch, No. 1, 123 App. Div. 23.) All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kling-v-tobias-nyappdiv-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack