Kling, D. v. Coleman, B.
This text of Kling, D. v. Coleman, B. (Kling, D. v. Coleman, B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DAVID C. KLING, : No. 17 MM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : BRIAN V. COLEMAN, COMMONWEALTH : OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND JUDGE : THOMAS H. KELLEY, VI, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition
for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief are
DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kling, D. v. Coleman, B., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kling-d-v-coleman-b-pa-2017.