Klineline v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Klineline v. United States

85 F.2d 628, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4206

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 30, 1936·No. No. 7051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There being no reviewable question presented on the record in this cause because the appellants neither requested findings of fact or conclusions of law on the trial of the case nor excepted to any finding or conclusion made by the trial court [Oyler v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (C.C.A.6); Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 30 F.(2d) 97 (C.C.A.6); United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 32 F.(2d) 887, 889 (C.C.A.6); Union Bleachery v. United States, 79 F.(2d) 549, 102 A.L.R. 204 (C.C.A.4)], it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There being no reviewable question presented on the record in this cause because the appellants neither requested findings of fact or conclusions of law on the trial of the case nor excepted to any finding or conclusion made by the trial court [Oyler v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (C.C.A.6); Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 30 F.(2d) 97 (C.C.A.6); United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 32 F.(2d) 887, 889 (C.C.A.6); Union Bleachery v. United States, 79 F.(2d) 549, 102 A.L.R. 204 (C.C.A.4)], it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Klineline v. United States, 85 F.2d 628, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4206 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

85 F.2d 628 (Klineline v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related