Klineline v. United States
This text of 85 F.2d 628 (Klineline v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being no reviewable question presented on the record in this cause because the appellants neither requested findings of fact or conclusions of law on the trial of the case nor excepted to any finding or conclusion made by the trial court [Oyler v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (C.C.A.6); Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 30 F.(2d) 97 (C.C.A.6); United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 32 F.(2d) 887, 889 (C.C.A.6); Union Bleachery v. United States, 79 F.(2d) 549, 102 A.L.R. 204 (C.C.A.4)], it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 F.2d 628, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klineline-v-united-states-ca6-1936.