Klineintie v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.

67 A. 573, 74 N.H. 276, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 41
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 4, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Young, J.

When the cause of the servant’s injury is a condition of the master’s instrumentalities produced either by ordinary wear or by the negligence of fellow-servants, he must show either that his master did and he did not know, or that his master was and he was not in fault for not knowing, of the defect in time to prevent the accident. St. Pierre v. Foster, ante, 4. In this case there is no evidence fi om which it can be found that the defendants either knew or ought to have known of the condition of the floor before the accident; consequently there is no evidence from *277 which it can be found that they failed to perform any duty the relation of master and servant imposed on them for the plaintiff’s benefit.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klineintie v. Nashua Manufacturing Co., 67 A. 573, 74 N.H. 276, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 41 (N.H. 1907).

67 A. 573 (Klineintie v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hook v. Consolidation Coal Co.
129 A. 490 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1925)
Marcotte v. Maynard Shoe Co.
85 A. 284 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1912)
Marshal v. Dalton Paper Mills
74 A. 108 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1909)
Parmaleau v. International Paper Co.
71 A. 31 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1908)