Kline v. Witmer

Supreme Court of Florida

Kline v. Witmer

165 So. 664, 122 Fla. 504, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 893

DecidedFebruary 7, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 664 (Kline v. Witmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kline v. Witmer, 165 So. 664, 122 Fla. 504, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 893 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal is by intervenors whose intervention was allowed more than thirty days after entry and record of final decree from order dissolving order restraining master’s sale under final decree, and which restraining order was granted on application of intervenors more than thirty days after final decree.

The restraining order did not purport to vacate the final decree. It only temporarily suspended the execution of the final decree.

The restraining order was dissolved after hearing.

No abuse of official discretion is made to appear and the order appealed from should be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI