Kline v. Urmston

Indiana Supreme Court

Kline v. Urmston

69 Ind. 416

DecidedNovember 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 69 Ind. 416 (Kline v. Urmston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kline v. Urmston, 69 Ind. 416 (Ind. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

Action bjf the appellees, against the appellant, upon an account for services as attorneys at law, performed by the plaintiffs for the defendant. Issue ; trial by jury ; verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

The only point made by the appellant is, that the verdict was not sus[417]*417tamed by the evidence, and that the amount found for the plaintiffs was too large.

Having looked through the evidence, we are of opinion that it fully sustained the verdict; and the amount found for the plaintiffs, $200.00, was not, in our opinion, too much.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

Action bjf the appellees, against the appellant, upon an account for services as attorneys at law, performed by the plaintiffs for the defendant. Issue ; trial by jury ; verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

The only point made by the appellant is, that the verdict was not sus[417]*417tamed by the evidence, and that the amount found for the plaintiffs was too large.

Having looked through the evidence, we are of opinion that it fully sustained the verdict; and the amount found for the plaintiffs, $200.00, was not, in our opinion, too much.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Ind. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kline-v-urmston-ind-1879.