Kline v. State
253 A.D. 788, 1 N.Y.S.2d 854
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1937·No. Claim No. 23775·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the finding that the defendant was engaged in his own business at the time of the assault, which was a prerequisite under the enabling [789] act,
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kline v. State, 253 A.D. 788, 1 N.Y.S.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
253 A.D. 788 (Kline v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Egan v. State
255 A.D. 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)