Kline v. State
253 A.D. 788
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1937
DocketClaim No. 23775
StatusPublished
This text of 253 A.D. 788 (Kline v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kline v. State, 253 A.D. 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the finding that the defendant was engaged in his own business at the time of the assault, which was a prerequisite under the enabling [789]*789act,
See Laws of 1934, chap. 808.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kline-v-state-nyappdiv-1937.