Kline v. Fineberg

426 So. 2d 1163, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28985
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1983
DocketNo. 82-842
StatusPublished

This text of 426 So. 2d 1163 (Kline v. Fineberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kline v. Fineberg, 426 So. 2d 1163, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where a complaint alleged fraud based on intentional misrepresentation or in the making of statements calculated to induce “without any regard to their truth or falsehood,” affidavits filed by buyer, setting out circumstances from which it could reasonably be inferred that the seller knew or should have known the falsity of statements contained in a prospectus, were sufficient to preclude a summary judgment in favor of seller. See Tatman v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co., 215 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) (conflict in inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence may raise genuine issues of material fact).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tatman v. American Heritage Life Insurance
215 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 So. 2d 1163, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kline-v-fineberg-fladistctapp-1983.