Kline v. Eagen
This text of 170 A. 263 (Kline v. Eagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These proceedings are before us on writ of certiorari and are based on a petition of plaintiff, a “qualified elector and voter of Lackawanna County,” averring “palpable fraud not apparent on the face of the returns” in the election for district attorney held November 7, 1933, in the First District of the Second Ward of the Borough of Archbald, and praying the court to issue “summary proceedings against the election officers and overseers of the election district complained of, and to bring them forthwith into court with all election papers in their possession; and upon fraud being discovered, the returns of said election district shall be corrected by the court, and a just return made in accordance with law.” After a full hearing the court dismissed the proceedings at petitioner’s costs. Appellant’s petition was presented to the judges of the court of common pleas sitting as a return board, and was in effect an attempt to have that body determine an election contest. This the lower court properly refused to do. “A recomputation is not a substitute for a contest in which the legality of the votes actually cast may be passed upon.” Luzerne County Election Returns, 301 Pa. 247, 258. See also In re Plains Twp. Election Returns, 280 Pa. 520.
The orders of the lower court are affirmed at petitioner’s cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A. 263, 314 Pa. 23, 1934 Pa. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kline-v-eagen-pa-1934.