Kline v. Chase
17 Cal. 596
Opinion
Cope, J. concurring.
Judgment affirmed, for the reasons given by the Judge below in his opinion. It is unnecessary to state these reasons, since the principles governing the case have already been settled in Harris v. Reynolds, (13 Cal.) and other cases.
See Knights v. Truett, 18 Cal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kline v. Chase, 17 Cal. 596 (Cal. 1861).
17 Cal. 596 (Kline v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christensen v. Forst
314 P.2d 746 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Carpenter v. Hamilton
147 P.2d 563 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
F. A. Patrick & Co. v. Knapp
145 N.W. 598 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
Whithed v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.
83 N.W. 238 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)
Clarke v. Cobb
54 P. 74 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Kane v. Mink
19 N.W. 852 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1884)
Otis v. McMillan & Sons
70 Ala. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
Walls v. Walker
37 Cal. 424 (California Supreme Court, 1869)