Klinck v. Kelly

15 Abb. Pr. 135
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·Published

Opinion

Fancher, J.

Where a sheriff succeeds in Ms de- . fense, he is entitled to double” costs, including disbursements ; that is, to the adjusted bill of costs and disbursements, fifty per cent, more must be added. The statute as to double costs is not affected by the Code.

Subdivision 7 of section 307 of the Code allows but • five term fees, and no more. All above that number must be stricken from' the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klinck v. Kelly, 15 Abb. Pr. 135 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

15 Abb. Pr. 135 (Klinck v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.