Klin Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
247 A.D. 764
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published
Opinion
Order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the separate and affirmative defenses contained in the answer, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, (Felberose Holding Corp. v. N. Y. Rapid Transit Corp., 244 App. Div. 427.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klin Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp., 247 A.D. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 764 (Klin Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Felberose Holding Corp. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
244 A.D. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)