Klima v. Sperry Gyroscope Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klima v. Sperry Gyroscope Division

39 A.D.2d 775, 333 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4458

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 775 (Klima v. Sperry Gyroscope Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klima v. Sperry Gyroscope Division, 39 A.D.2d 775, 333 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 31, 1971, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated March 10, 1971, denying petitioner’s application to reopen the matter before the State Division of Human Rights. The Division had dismissed petitioner’s complaint on October 13, 1970. Petition dismissed and order of the Appeal Board confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the record amply discloses the reasonableness of the determination in question. Hopkins, Acting,P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated December 31, 1971, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated March 10, 1971, denying petitioner’s application to reopen the matter before the State Division of Human Rights. The Division had dismissed petitioner’s complaint on October 13, 1970. Petition dismissed and order of the Appeal Board confirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the record amply discloses the reasonableness of the determination in question. Hopkins, Acting,P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 775, 333 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klima-v-sperry-gyroscope-division-nyappdiv-1972.