Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kligman v. Guevara

Kligman v. Guevara

18 A.D.3d 821, 795 N.Y.S.2d 453
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.3d 821 (Kligman v. Guevara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kligman v. Guevara, 18 A.D.3d 821, 795 N.Y.S.2d 453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages [822]*822for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kelly, J.), dated June 7, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that there are triable issues of fact concerning how the subject automobile accident occurred and who was at fault in the happening of the accident (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.3d 821, 795 N.Y.S.2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kligman-v-guevara-nyappdiv-2005.