Kliensmith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Kliensmith v. State

1918 OK CR 166, 175 P. 943, 15 Okla. Crim. 215, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 23, 1918

DocketNo. A-3092.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1918 OK CR 166 (Kliensmith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kliensmith v. State, 1918 OK CR 166, 175 P. 943, 15 Okla. Crim. 215, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, Billy Klien-smith, was convicted in'the district court of Carter county on an information charging that in said county on or about the 10th day of November, 1916, he did then and there unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously open, conduct, and carry on, in the town of Dundee, certain banking and percentage games, played with dice, cards, and other devices for money, checks, and other representatives of value, and his punishment was fixed at imprisonment in the peni *216 tentiary for the term of one year and a fine of $500. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on July 14, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed, and when the case was called for final submission no appearance was made for plaintiff in error. It was thereupon submitted on the record.

Upon a careful examination of the same, we find that the evidence on the part of the state sufficiently supports the allegations of the information. No objection was made or exception taken to the charge of the court. An examination of the same discloses that it fully and fairly states the law of the case.

Finding no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, Billy Klien-smith, was convicted in'the district court of Carter county on an information charging that in said county on or about the 10th day of November, 1916, he did then and there unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously open, conduct, and carry on, in the town of Dundee, certain banking and percentage games, played with dice, cards, and other devices for money, checks, and other representatives of value, and his punishment was fixed at imprisonment in the peni *216 tentiary for the term of one year and a fine of $500. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on July 14, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed, and when the case was called for final submission no appearance was made for plaintiff in error. It was thereupon submitted on the record.

Upon a careful examination of the same, we find that the evidence on the part of the state sufficiently supports the allegations of the information. No objection was made or exception taken to the charge of the court. An examination of the same discloses that it fully and fairly states the law of the case.

Finding no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK CR 166, 175 P. 943, 15 Okla. Crim. 215, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kliensmith-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack