Kliegman v. McGoldrick
This text of 285 A.D. 1065 (Kliegman v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of the respondent, State Rent Administrator, which establishes the maximum rent of an apartment in a building owned by appellants at $64.25 a month. The administrator found that the maximum rent on March 1, 1943, was $55; that 15% is to be added thereto under the equalization adjustment of May 1,1953, and that an additional $1 is to be added for a television aerial. Appellants contend that the maximum rent on March 1, 1943, was $60, as appears from the registration certificate filed with the Federal rent office by the then owner of the premises. The proof is that on March 1, 1943, the premises were under a lease calling for $60 a month, but the lease instrument further provided that the tenant might pay $55, and did actually pay $55. The proof further establishes that after the equalization adjustment regulations came into effect on May 1, 1953, the appellants demanded $70 a month from the tenant, and that upon refusal appellants brought a summary proceeding in the Municipal Court of the City of New York where, in reliance upon the registration certificate, the court granted a final order in favor of appellants. Thereafter, the local rent administrator determined the maximum rent to be $64.25. In a second dispossess proceeding brought by the appellants, the determination fixing the maximum rent at $64.25 was before the court and the proceeding was dismissed. Petitioners appeal from an order denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — MacCrate, Acting, P. J., Schmidt, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 1065, 140 N.Y.S.2d 510, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kliegman-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1955.