Kliebert v. General Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kliebert v. General Electric Co.

268 A.D.2d 306, 700 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 464

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 306 (Kliebert v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kliebert v. General Electric Co., 268 A.D.2d 306, 700 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered June 3, 1998, in favor of defendants and against plaintiff in the amount of $60,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered September 25, 1997, which denied plaintiffs motions to vacate his defaults in opposing defendants’ prior motions to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, such order already having been affirmed by this Court (254 AD2d 197).

The value of defendants’ attorneys’ services, which plaintiff was directed to pay as a sanction for frivolous conduct, was [307]*307reasonably assessed at $60,000. Plaintiffs other arguments are without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered June 3, 1998, in favor of defendants and against plaintiff in the amount of $60,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered September 25, 1997, which denied plaintiffs motions to vacate his defaults in opposing defendants’ prior motions to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, such order already having been affirmed by this Court (254 AD2d 197).

The value of defendants’ attorneys’ services, which plaintiff was directed to pay as a sanction for frivolous conduct, was [307]*307reasonably assessed at $60,000. Plaintiffs other arguments are without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 306, 700 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kliebert-v-general-electric-co-nyappdiv-2000.