Kletter v. Kletter

New York Supreme Court

Kletter v. Kletter

47 Misc. 2d 846, 263 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1982

DecidedApril 30, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 47 Misc. 2d 846 (Kletter v. Kletter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kletter v. Kletter, 47 Misc. 2d 846, 263 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1982 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Arthur G. Klein, J.

On the settlement of an order directing payment of counsel fees, the attorneys for the husband urge that upon payment of counsel fees to the wife, she might discontinue this action; and in any event might never proceed to trial of the action.

By counterorder they propose that counsel fees be made payable to the wife’s attorneys, to be held by them in escrow, pending trial of the action.

The court is of the opinion that such provision is unnecessary. The defendant is fully protected against a unilateral discontinuance by CPLR 3217; and if plaintiff fails to notice the case for trial as directed by the court, the defendant may take appropriate steps to notice the case.

The order presented by the movant has accordingly been signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur G. Klein, J.

On the settlement of an order directing payment of counsel fees, the attorneys for the husband urge that upon payment of counsel fees to the wife, she might discontinue this action; and in any event might never proceed to trial of the action.

By counterorder they propose that counsel fees be made payable to the wife’s attorneys, to be held by them in escrow, pending trial of the action.

The court is of the opinion that such provision is unnecessary. The defendant is fully protected against a unilateral discontinuance by CPLR 3217; and if plaintiff fails to notice the case for trial as directed by the court, the defendant may take appropriate steps to notice the case.

The order presented by the movant has accordingly been signed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 Misc. 2d 846, 263 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kletter-v-kletter-nysupct-1965.