Klepaczyk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Klepaczyk v. State

742 So. 2d 481, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12667, 1999 WL 771395

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 1999·No. No. 98-03225·Published

Opinion

SCHEB, JOHN M., Senior Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment revoking Carolyn Klepaezyk’s probation and the sentence the court imposed. We remand, however, for entry of a revocation order listing the specific conditions of probation that she violated. See Lundy v. State, 736 So.2d 159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); [482] Batten v. State, 589 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHEB, JOHN M., Senior Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment revoking Carolyn Klepaezyk’s probation and the sentence the court imposed. We remand, however, for entry of a revocation order listing the specific conditions of probation that she violated. See Lundy v. State, 736 So.2d 159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); [482] Batten v. State, 589 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.

Klepaczyk v. State, 742 So. 2d 481, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12667, 1999 WL 771395 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

742 So. 2d 481 (Klepaczyk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related