Klenosky v. Herman

13 A.D.2d 682, 215 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11517

This text of 13 A.D.2d 682 (Klenosky v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klenosky v. Herman, 13 A.D.2d 682, 215 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator denying a protest to an' order of a Local Rent Administrator which determined that two front rooms of a five-room apartment were subject to rent control and established the maximum rent therefor at $60 a mouth, the landlord appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 26,1960, denying her petition and dismissing the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion, Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Pette, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.2d 682, 215 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klenosky-v-herman-nyappdiv-1961.