Kleist v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.
This text of 241 A.D. 713 (Kleist v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. The plaintiff may examine Joseph P. Bohan and the material produced by him. After such examination the motion for inspection and discovery may be renewed if there is any necessity for such renewal. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleist-v-general-outdoor-advertising-co-nyappdiv-1934.