Kleintank v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kleintank v. State

211 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 836613, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2849

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kleintank v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14654 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-3809·Published

Opinion

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Respondent’s concession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court denying Petitioner’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion for reduction or modification of sentence. On remand, the trial court is directed to consider the motion on the merits. See Manspeaker v. State, 90 So.3d 998, 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Respondent’s concession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court denying Petitioner’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion for reduction or modification of sentence. On remand, the trial court is directed to consider the motion on the merits. See Manspeaker v. State, 90 So.3d 998, 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur

Kleintank v. State, 211 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 836613, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

211 So. 3d 1142 (Kleintank v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related