Kleintank v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kleintank v. State

211 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 836613, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2849

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 3, 2017

DocketCase No. 5D16-3809

StatusPublished

This text of 211 So. 3d 1142 (Kleintank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kleintank v. State, 211 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 836613, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Respondent’s concession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court denying Petitioner’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion for reduction or modification of sentence. On remand, the trial court is directed to consider the motion on the merits. See Manspeaker v. State, 90 So.3d 998, 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI