Kleinschmidt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co.
This text of 599 So. 2d 208 (Kleinschmidt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William E. Kleinschmidt appeals an order dismissing his complaint against defendant-appellee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. for failure to serve defendant within the time provided by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j). The trial court took testimony and found that while the plaintiff-appellant has certain physical infirmities, they did not constitute disability of the magnitude necessary to constitute good cause for failure to effect service for a period of 22 months. See A & W Electric of Miami, Inc. v. Abraira, 567 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Schlakman v. Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf 519 So.2d 14, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We see no basis on which to disturb the trial court’s ruling on that point, or on the other issues raised by appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 So. 2d 208, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468, 1992 WL 98304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinschmidt-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1992.