Kleinpeter v. Murrell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Kleinpeter v. Murrell

387 So. 2d 1388, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4242

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedAugust 20, 1980

DocketNo. 7658

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 387 So. 2d 1388 (Kleinpeter v. Murrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kleinpeter v. Murrell, 387 So. 2d 1388, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4242 (La. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

STOKER, Judge.

This case was consolidated for hearing on certain peremptory exceptions and on appeal with companion suits including Elliott, et al. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, et al., 387 So.2d 1383 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1980), which is being decided this date.

The issues and applicable law in this case are substantially the same as those in Elliott v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, supra. ' For the reasons we assigned therein we reverse and set aside the judgment of the trial court dated October 12, 1979, sustaining the peremptory exceptions filed on July 10, 1979, on behalf of Curtis Elliott, individually and as administrator of the estate of the minor, Randy Elliott, on behalf of Robert D. Gustafson, individually and as administrator of the estate of Robert Barry Gustafson, on behalf of Robert Barry Gustafson and on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. The costs of this appeal are assessed to exceptors — appellees.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STOKER, Judge.

This case was consolidated for hearing on certain peremptory exceptions and on appeal with companion suits including Elliott, et al. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, et al., 387 So.2d 1383 (La.App. 3rd Cir., 1980), which is being decided this date.

The issues and applicable law in this case are substantially the same as those in Elliott v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, supra. ' For the reasons we assigned therein we reverse and set aside the judgment of the trial court dated October 12, 1979, sustaining the peremptory exceptions filed on July 10, 1979, on behalf of Curtis Elliott, individually and as administrator of the estate of the minor, Randy Elliott, on behalf of Robert D. Gustafson, individually and as administrator of the estate of Robert Barry Gustafson, on behalf of Robert Barry Gustafson and on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. The costs of this appeal are assessed to exceptors — appellees.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

387 So. 2d 1388, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 4242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinpeter-v-murrell-lactapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack