Kleinman v. Supreme Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kleinman v. Supreme Court

254 A.D. 865, 4 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 865 (Kleinman v. Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kleinman v. Supreme Court, 254 A.D. 865, 4 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner, William W. Kleinman, applies for an order (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 78) which shall restrain the respondents from making and entering any order and from any further proceedings upon the motion of the respondents, Attorney-General of the State of New York and Hiram C. Todd, Special Assistant Attorney-General, for an order directing a joint trial of defendants William W. Kleinman, Giuseppe F. L. Dardis and Henry G. Singer under indictment No. 14, and for other appropriate and related relief. Application for such order of restraint granted. (People ex rel. Singer v. Rogers, post, p. 865, decided herewith.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner, William W. Kleinman, applies for an order (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 78) which shall restrain the respondents from making and entering any order and from any further proceedings upon the motion of the respondents, Attorney-General of the State of New York and Hiram C. Todd, Special Assistant Attorney-General, for an order directing a joint trial of defendants William W. Kleinman, Giuseppe F. L. Dardis and Henry G. Singer under indictment No. 14, and for other appropriate and related relief. Application for such order of restraint granted. (People ex rel. Singer v. Rogers, post, p. 865, decided herewith.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 865, 4 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinman-v-supreme-court-nyappdiv-1938.