Kleinman v. Benson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kleinman v. Benson

261 A.D. 1104, 27 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8981

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 1941·Published

Opinion

In a reorganization proceeding, order granting allowances for services and disbursements modified on the facts by adding the appellant’s name, together with an allowance of $500, to the second decretal paragraph and by striking appellant’s name from the third decretal paragraph. As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, payable out of the general assets. It is the opinion of the court that under the facts and circumstances the allowance to this attorney should have been made, as recommended by the Deputy Superintendent of Insurance. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a reorganization proceeding, order granting allowances for services and disbursements modified on the facts by adding the appellant’s name, together with an allowance of $500, to the second decretal paragraph and by striking appellant’s name from the third decretal paragraph. As thus modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, payable out of the general assets. It is the opinion of the court that under the facts and circumstances the allowance to this attorney should have been made, as recommended by the Deputy Superintendent of Insurance. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Kleinman v. Benson, 261 A.D. 1104, 27 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 1104 (Kleinman v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.