Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz
554 So. 2d 23, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1989·No. Nos. 88-1879, 88-2464 and 88-2748·Published
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s judgment determining that the property settlement agreement was clear and unambiguous on its face and provided for the relief requested by the wife. Pearson v. Pearson, 342 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We reverse the award of attorney’s fees because the wife failed to file a financial affidavit as required by rule 1.611(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, nor did she present competent evidence of her need. Cf. Williamson v. Williamson, 335 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz, 554 So. 2d 23, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
554 So. 2d 23 (Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pearson v. Pearson
342 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Williamson v. Williamson
335 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)