Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz

Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz

554 So. 2d 23, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 1989
DocketNos. 88-1879, 88-2464 and 88-2748
StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 23 (Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz, 554 So. 2d 23, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment determining that the property settlement agreement was clear and unambiguous on its face and provided for the relief requested by the wife. Pearson v. Pearson, 342 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We reverse the award of attorney’s fees because the wife failed to file a financial affidavit as required by rule 1.611(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, nor did she present competent evidence of her need. Cf. Williamson v. Williamson, 335 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearson v. Pearson
342 So. 2d 1018 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Williamson v. Williamson
335 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 So. 2d 23, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinhenz-v-kleinhenz-fladistctapp-1989.