Kleinhaus v. Generous

25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 667
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1874·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

1. Where the principal debtor has amply-indemnified the surety by mortgage, an agreement by the-creditor with the principal debtor to extend the time of credit does not discharge the surety.

2. Partners in mercantile business have power to bind the-firm by borrowing money for its use, and when money isbona fide so loaned for its use, a subsequent misapplication of the money to the individual use of the partner will not deprive the lender of his remedy against the other members-of the firm.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kleinhaus v. Generous, 25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 667 (Ohio 1874).

25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 667 (Kleinhaus v. Generous) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.