Kleinert & Rosenbluth, Inc. v. Glucksman

125 N.Y.S. 660
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 11, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 125 N.Y.S. 660 (Kleinert & Rosenbluth, Inc. v. Glucksman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kleinert & Rosenbluth, Inc. v. Glucksman, 125 N.Y.S. 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record that the plaintiff was not accorded a trial or hearing. Under these circumstances, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 N.Y.S. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinert-rosenbluth-inc-v-glucksman-nyappterm-1910.