Kleinberg Electric, Inc. v. East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kleinberg Electric, Inc. v. East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp.

199 A.D.2d 188, 608 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12187

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 188 (Kleinberg Electric, Inc. v. East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kleinberg Electric, Inc. v. East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp., 199 A.D.2d 188, 608 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered October 20, 1992, upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendants awarding damages in the amount of $109,264.96 inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The several improprieties catalogued by defendants concerning plaintiff’s counsel’s summation remarks, while not to be condoned, did not, separately or together, deprive them of a fair trial (see, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 192 AD2d 228, 230-231). Defendants’ other contention, that the jury’s responses to the court’s special verdict sheet were inconsistent, is without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered October 20, 1992, upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendants awarding damages in the amount of $109,264.96 inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The several improprieties catalogued by defendants concerning plaintiff’s counsel’s summation remarks, while not to be condoned, did not, separately or together, deprive them of a fair trial (see, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 192 AD2d 228, 230-231). Defendants’ other contention, that the jury’s responses to the court’s special verdict sheet were inconsistent, is without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 188, 608 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleinberg-electric-inc-v-east-67th-street-townhouse-building-corp-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack