Klein v. Sheppard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klein v. Sheppard

52 A.D.2d 532, 381 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12065

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 532 (Klein v. Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klein v. Sheppard, 52 A.D.2d 532, 381 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinions

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered April 30, 1975, directing that the respondent-appellant pay $100 per week for support of each of his two infant children and awarding $2,500 in counsel fees, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the [533]*533extent of directing that the respondent-appellant continue to pay child support as previously paid and reducing the counsel fees to be paid by respondent-appellant to $1,250 and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have found the awards granted in this matter to be excessive and have reduced them accordingly. Concur—Murphy, Capozzoli, and Lane JJ.,; Kupferman, J. P., and Silverman, J., concur in the following memorandum in which Murphy, J., also concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered April 30, 1975, directing that the respondent-appellant pay $100 per week for support of each of his two infant children and awarding $2,500 in counsel fees, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the [533]*533extent of directing that the respondent-appellant continue to pay child support as previously paid and reducing the counsel fees to be paid by respondent-appellant to $1,250 and, as modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have found the awards granted in this matter to be excessive and have reduced them accordingly. Concur—Murphy, Capozzoli, and Lane JJ.,; Kupferman, J. P., and Silverman, J., concur in the following memorandum in which Murphy, J., also concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 532, 381 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-sheppard-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack