Klein v. Rauschman
This text of 67 A.D.2d 902 (Klein v. Rauschman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— In an action to recover damages (1) "for conspiracy to defeat and obstruct justice” and (2) "for libel and slander”, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 15, 1977, which denied his motion to restore the action to the Trial Calendar. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In the course of bankruptcy proceedings, the United States District Court for the [903]*903Southern District of New York, on March 27, 1974, issued an order staying suits against the debtor Walston & Co., a defendant herein. That stay was in effect on September 9, 1974, the date on which the Supreme Court, Kings County, at Trial Term, marked this action "Off Cal. to be Restored on 5 days’ notice”. The stay remained in effect until the Federal court lifted it by order dated June 15, 1977. Accordingly, the order of the Federal court stayed operation of CPLR 3404 as to this action. Thus, when by notice of motion dated June 23, 1977 plaintiff moved to restore the action to the Trial Calendar, that motion should have been granted. Even if, arguendo, the operation of CPLR 3404 was technically not stayed by the Federal court order, as a matter of law plaintiff rebutted the presumption that the action had been abandoned (see Marco v Sachs, 10 NY2d 542). O’Connor, Shapiro and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.D.2d 902, 413 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-rauschman-nyappdiv-1979.