Klein v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klein v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

59 A.D.2d 701, 398 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13651

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 3, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 701 (Klein v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klein v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board, 59 A.D.2d 701, 398 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent-appellant which fixed certain air conditioning charges, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 27, 1976, which (1) granted the petition, (2) annulled the determination and (3) determined that the proper air conditioning charge to the petitioner for the one-year period commencing Septem[702]*702ber 1, 1974 was $98. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly by appellants. We find that Special Term’s analysis with respect to the proper air conditioning charge to be paid by the petitioner for the one-year period commencing September 1, 1974 was correct. Martuscello, J. P., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent-appellant which fixed certain air conditioning charges, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 27, 1976, which (1) granted the petition, (2) annulled the determination and (3) determined that the proper air conditioning charge to the petitioner for the one-year period commencing Septem[702]*702ber 1, 1974 was $98. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly by appellants. We find that Special Term’s analysis with respect to the proper air conditioning charge to be paid by the petitioner for the one-year period commencing September 1, 1974 was correct. Martuscello, J. P., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 701, 398 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-new-york-city-conciliation-appeals-board-nyappdiv-1977.