Klein v. Long Island Railroad

278 A.D. 980, 105 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5425
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 1951·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In ah action jo recover damages by reason of the death of plaintiff’s intestate, allege'd to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence in the operation ,tif one bf its trains, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor bf plaintiff after a trial without a jury. Judgment affirmed, with costs.. (Nóseworthy v: City of New York, 298 K, Y. 76.) Carswell, Sneed áiid MácCrate, JJ.j concur; kplari, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse -the judgment and to. dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum: In .my opinion the circumstances, surrounding the accident and ijs cause are left entirely to conjecture, and. the facts established are not sufficient to justify ah inference that the accident .was caused by appellant’s negligence. Adél, J., concurs with Hóíáñ, P. <f. [Í99 Mise. 532.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klein v. Long Island Railroad, 278 A.D. 980, 105 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 980 (Klein v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz v. Long Island Rail Road
28 A.D.2d 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Quashnofsky v. Davies Building, Inc.
4 Misc. 2d 38 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Stein v. Palisi
125 N.E.2d 575 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)
Wank v. Ambrosino
121 N.E.2d 246 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Keenan v. Sheehan
205 Misc. 183 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Wank v. Ambrosino
282 A.D. 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)