Klein v. Kramer

248 A.D. 617
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument referred to the court that rendered the decision. [See 246 App. Div. 760; 247 id. 725.] Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ. The parties having stipulated in writing that this motion may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision of the court is as follows: Motion for reargument granted and on reargument order denying motion of a holder of a second mortgage for judgment for the amount due on the bond secured by the mortgage reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s ’motion for judgment granted, with ten dollars costs. (See Realty Associates Securities Corporation v. Hoblin, 247 App. Div. 904.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klein v. Kramer, 248 A.D. 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 617 (Klein v. Kramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U. S. B. & M. Liquidation Corp. v. Hilton
5 Mass. App. Div. 184 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1940)