Klein v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klein v. Klein

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8193

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 894 (Klein v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klein v. Klein, 251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff-appellant, wife, for separation from Bed and board upon the ground of abandonment and non-support, order denying plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee modified by providing therein for an award of counsel fee to the plaintiff in the sum of $250, $125 thereof to be paid within ten days from the. entry of the order hereon and the remainder to be paid when the case is brought on for trial. As so modified the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion, the plaintiff’s proofs were sufficient to warrant the award of counsel fee, but not of alimony in view of the present provision by the defendant for the support of plaintiff and of the infant child of the parties. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiff-appellant, wife, for separation from Bed and board upon the ground of abandonment and non-support, order denying plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee modified by providing therein for an award of counsel fee to the plaintiff in the sum of $250, $125 thereof to be paid within ten days from the. entry of the order hereon and the remainder to be paid when the case is brought on for trial. As so modified the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion, the plaintiff’s proofs were sufficient to warrant the award of counsel fee, but not of alimony in view of the present provision by the defendant for the support of plaintiff and of the infant child of the parties. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 894, 298 N.Y.S. 634, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-klein-nyappdiv-1937.