Klein v. Klein

1 How. N.P. 266
Michigan Superior Court, Detroit·Decided October 15, 1883·Published

Opinion

The Court,

Ci-iipmam, J.:

Held that the service of the writ having been by copy, the service was void. The court intimated that an order that defendant [267]*267show cause why he should not be punished for contempt, was the proper remedy.

(October, 1883.) Otto Kirehner for Complainant. .Alfred E. Hawes for Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klein v. Klein, 1 How. N.P. 266 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1883).

1 How. N.P. 266 (Klein v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.