Klein v. Klein

1 How. N.P. 266
CourtMichigan Superior Court, Detroit
DecidedOctober 15, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 266 (Klein v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Superior Court, Detroit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klein v. Klein, 1 How. N.P. 266 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

The Court,

Ci-iipmam, J.:

Held that the service of the writ having been by copy, the service was void. The court intimated that an order that defendant [267]*267show cause why he should not be punished for contempt, was the proper remedy.

(October, 1883.) Otto Kirehner for Complainant. .Alfred E. Hawes for Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. N.P. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-klein-michsuperctdetr-1883.