Klein v. Horowitz
This text of 240 A.D. 495 (Klein v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since it is admitted that the appellant is a trustee for the plaintiff, he is under a duty to account to her for his administration of the trust. The court should not, however, have directed payment to the plaintiff of the sum of $2,500, or any other sum, for the affidavits present issues of fact concerning the liability of the trustee upon any accounting which may be had.
The judgment and order should be modified by ehminating the provisions requiring the appellant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $2,500, with interest, and by directing an accounting before the justice at Special Term, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Judgment and order modified by ehminating the provisions requiring the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $2,500, with interest, and by directing an accounting before the justice at Special Term, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 495, 270 N.Y.S. 834, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-horowitz-nyappdiv-1934.