Klein v. Furriers Joint Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klein v. Furriers Joint Council

13 A.D.2d 922, 217 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 922 (Klein v. Furriers Joint Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klein v. Furriers Joint Council, 13 A.D.2d 922, 217 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on August 11, 1959, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to pay the plaintiffs and those similarly situated, the sum of $50 per month retirement fund instead of $35 per month, pending the trial of this action, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order entered on August 11, 1959, granting the cross motion of the defendant, Furriers Joint Council, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order filed. Order entered on August 11, 1959, granting cross motion of defendant, the Retirement Fund of the Fur Manufacturers, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on August 11, 1959, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to pay the plaintiffs and those similarly situated, the sum of $50 per month retirement fund instead of $35 per month, pending the trial of this action, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order entered on August 11, 1959, granting the cross motion of the defendant, Furriers Joint Council, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order filed. Order entered on August 11, 1959, granting cross motion of defendant, the Retirement Fund of the Fur Manufacturers, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 922, 217 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-furriers-joint-council-nyappdiv-1961.