Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

32 Misc. 774, 66 N.Y.S. 472
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 774 (Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klein v. East River Electric Light Co., 32 Misc. 774, 66 N.Y.S. 472 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Hascall, J.

This appeal only brings up for review a question of law. Both sides, at the trial, moved for direction of a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. No motion for dismissal of complaint was made by defendants when plaintiff rested, as might properly have been done, so their point that plaintiff had not proven ownership [775]*775is not well taken, the right to so object having been waived by their silence. We think that, under the authorities cited (96 U. S. 51, 7 Wall. 82 and 31 Misc. Rep. 87), the ruling of the trial justice was correct.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aurora City v. West
74 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 1869)
Cromwell v. County of Sac
96 U.S. 51 (Supreme Court, 1878)
German-American Bank v. Milliman
31 Misc. 87 (New York County Courts, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 774, 66 N.Y.S. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-east-river-electric-light-co-nynyccityct-1900.