Klein v. Dunn

86 N.Y.S. 101
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 25, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the facts disclosed by the record the action of the trial justice in granting to the defendant a new trial, under' section 999 of the Code, after a verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon a contested trial, cannot be disturbed. The authorities are strongly in favor of the exercise of the power in a proper case. Ferguson v. Gill, 74 Hun, 566, 26 N. Y. Supp. 596; Young v. Stone, 77 Hun, 395, 28 N. Y. Supp. 881; Ludeman v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 30 App. Div. 522, 52 N. Y. Supp. 310; Silverman v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 69 App. Div. 22, 74 N. Y. Supp. 481.

Order affirmed,- with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klein v. Dunn, 86 N.Y.S. 101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

86 N.Y.S. 101 (Klein v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ludeman v. Third Avenue Railroad
30 A.D. 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Silverman v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad
69 A.D. 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)
Ferguson v. Gill
26 N.Y.S. 596 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Young v. Stone
28 N.Y.S. 881 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)