Klein v. Commissioner

154 F.2d 58, 34 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1082, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3707
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 25, 1946·No. No. 9021·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question involved in this case is whether the taxpayer retained sufficient control over a trust fund which he created to justify the Commissioner in taxing him as the owner of the trust income under Section 22(a) of 'the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 22(a), as construed in Helvering v. Clifford, 1940, 309 U.S. 331, 60 S.Ct. 554, 84 L.Ed. 788. The Tax Court found that the taxpayer “was, in reality, the owner of this income during the taxable year.” While this is, as the taxpayer urges, a conclusion drawn by the Tax Court from the evidential facts, it is one which we think this court is not at liberty to review. Dobson v. Commissioner, 1943, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239, 88 L.Ed. 248; John Kelley Co. v. Commissioner, 1946, 66 S.Ct. 299.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klein v. Commissioner, 154 F.2d 58, 34 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1082, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3707 (3d Cir. 1946).

154 F.2d 58 (Klein v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chertoff v. Commissioner
160 F.2d 691 (Sixth Circuit, 1947)
Cory v. Commissioner
159 F.2d 391 (Third Circuit, 1947)