Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc.
41 Misc. 2d 601, 246 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1330
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 3, 1963·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Section 192 (subd. c, par. [2]) of the New York City Civil Court Act does not preclude consideration of a motion to increase the ad damnum clause above $3,000 on the merits, simply because the case was originally instituted in the Municipal Court and transferred automatically. (Cohen v. Bezold, 37 Misc 2d 1081; Dolce v. Cayuga Foundation Corp., 38 Misc 2d 1078.)
The order should be reversed, without costs, and motion remanded for determination on the merits.
Concur — Brown, Gulotta and Croat, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc., 41 Misc. 2d 601, 246 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).
41 Misc. 2d 601 (Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newman v. Coakley
285 A.2d 690 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1972)
Sobelsohn v. Pincus
41 Misc. 2d 913 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)