Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc.

41 Misc. 2d 601, 246 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1330

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 41 Misc. 2d 601 (Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klein v. 124-132 White Street, Inc., 41 Misc. 2d 601, 246 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 192 (subd. c, par. [2]) of the New York City Civil Court Act does not preclude consideration of a motion to increase the ad damnum clause above $3,000 on the merits, simply because the case was originally instituted in the Municipal Court and transferred automatically. (Cohen v. Bezold, 37 Misc 2d 1081; Dolce v. Cayuga Foundation Corp., 38 Misc 2d 1078.)

The order should be reversed, without costs, and motion remanded for determination on the merits.

Concur — Brown, Gulotta and Croat, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI