KLEIMAN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana
DecidedApril 17, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-00490
StatusUnknown

This text of KLEIMAN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC (KLEIMAN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KLEIMAN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC, (S.D. Ind. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION

MAXIMILIAN KLEIMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:24-cv-00490-JPH-MKK ) CENTURION HEALTH LLC, ) HEFLIN, ) ALAN REYES, ) LYNDAL WEIR, ) BROOKE CORNELIUS, ) MURRAY YOUNG, ) JOHN DOE, ) PABLO PEREZ, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff Maximillian Kleiman is a prisoner currently incarcerated at Putnamville Correctional Facility ("Putnamville"). He initiated this action on October 10, 2024, with the filing of his complaint. Dkt. 2. Mr. Kleiman alleges in this civil rights action that he underwent two failed hernia surgeries and continues to be denied proper medical care for his hernia. Because Mr. Kleiman is a "prisoner," this Court must screen the complaint before service on the defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (c). I. Screening Standard When screening a complaint, the Court must dismiss any portion that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim for relief, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). To determine whether the complaint states a claim, the Court applies the same standard as when addressing a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Schillinger v. Kiley, 954 F.3d 990, 993 (7th Cir. 2020).

Under that standard, a complaint must include "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). "A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). The Court construes pro se complaints liberally and holds them to a "less stringent standard than pleadings drafted by lawyers." Cesal v. Moats, 851 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 2017).

II. The Complaint Mr. Kleiman's factual allegations are accepted as true at the pleading stage. See Lisby v. Henderson, 74 F.4th 470, 472 (7th Cir. 2023). The complaint names eight defendants: (1) Centurion Health LLC; (2) Dr. Heflin, Centurion Health CIF; (3) Surgeon Alan Reyes, Centurion/Terre Haute Regional Hospital; (4) LPN Lyndal Weir, Centurion Health PCF; (5) QMA Brooke Cornelius, Centurion Health PCF; (6) Dr. Murray Young, Centurion Health Prescription Medication Approval Manager; (7) Surgeon John Doe, Centurion /

Ascension St. Vincent Hospital Anderson Indiana; and (8) Dr. Pablo Perez, Centurion Health PCF. Dkt. 2 at 1. For all relevant events, Mr. Kleiman was housed at either the Correctional Industrial Facility ("CIF") or Putnamville, both of which are Indiana Department of Correction facilities. In his complaint, Mr. Kleiman alleges that he was denied adequate medical care after a hernia repair surgery conducted by Surgeon John Doe of Ascension St. Vincent Hospital of Anderson, Indiana in 2021. Dkt. 2 at 2. Dr.

Heflin, who worked at CIF, approved the aforementioned hernia repair surgery. Id. After the surgery, Mr. Kleiman immediately believed that the surgery was "botched" and "a failure." Id. Over the next few months, Mr. Kleiman submitted numerous health care request forms and grievances at CIF, but his grievances went unanswered, and he was only provided with Tylenol to treat his pain. Id. Mr. Kleiman persisted with his efforts to obtain care for his botched surgery, and Dr. Heflin ultimately ordered a follow up ultrasound,

which took place in early 2022. Id. at 2–3. The results of the ultrasound revealed that there was an abnormality near the site of the hernia repair surgery, which Dr. Heflin referred to as scar tissue. Id. at 3. Since Mr. Kleiman's arrival at Putnamville, he has submitted health care requests for care and pain management medication. Id. Mr. Kleiman was prescribed medication in early 2024 by Dr. Perez, but that medication was either interrupted or denied by Centurion Prescription Medication Approval Manager Dr. Murray Young. Id.

Mr. Kleiman's abnormality turned out to be the original hernia, and he ended up undergoing a second surgery to replace the hernia mesh inserted by John Doe Surgeon of Ascension St. Vincent. Id. On September 26, 2024, the second surgery was performed by Dr. Reyes at Terre Haute Regional Hospital. Id. Mr. Kleiman described the second surgery as a "botched and horrific surgical endeavor." Id. Mr. Kleiman thinks that the hernia mesh was not searched for and was not located during the second surgery, and therefore he

requires further medical attention. Id. When Mr. Kleiman returned to Putnamville, he requested further medical attention from staff including B. Cornelius and C. Weir. Id. Mr. Kleiman thinks that they were following an "incorrect" post-operative recovery guide provided by Terre Haute Regional surgical staff. Id. The report failed to mention that Mr. Kleiman had "mesh floating around inside [his] body." Id. Mr. Kleiman seeks injunctive and monetary relief. Id. at 5. III. Discussion of Claims

Applying the screening standard to the factual allegations in the complaint certain claims are dismissed while other claims shall proceed as submitted. First, claims against Surgeon John Doe Centurion / Ascension St. Vincent Hospital Anderson, Indiana is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because "it is pointless to include [an] anonymous defendant [ ] in federal court; this type of placeholder does not open the door to relation back under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, nor can it otherwise

help the plaintiff." Wudtke v. Davel, 128 F.3d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir. 1997) (internal citations omitted). Bringing suit against unnamed, or "John Doe," defendants in federal court is generally disfavored by the Seventh Circuit. Accordingly, any claim against Surgeon John Doe Centurion / Ascension St. Vincent Hospital Anderson, Indiana is dismissed. Second, all claims against Centurion Health LLC are dismissed for failure

to state a claim because it "cannot be held liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on a theory of respondeat superior for constitutional violations committed by their employees. It can, however, be held liable for unconstitutional . . . policies or customs." Simpson v. Brown County, 860 F.3d 1001, 1005–06 (7th Cir. 2017) (citing Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690–91 (1978)). There are no factual allegations in the complaint that support the legal conclusion that Centurion had an unconstitutional practice or policy as it relates to Mr. Kleiman's hernia issues. See dkt. 2. Thus, any

claim against Centurion Health LLC is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The following claims shall proceed: • An Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Dr. Heflin for his inadequate medical treatment of Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
436 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Karl F. Wudtke and Hope C. Wudtke v. Frederick J. Davel
128 F.3d 1057 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
John Simpson v. Brown County, Indiana
860 F.3d 1001 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)
Cesal v. Moats
851 F.3d 714 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
KLEIMAN v. CENTURION HEALTH LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleiman-v-centurion-health-llc-insd-2025.