Klehr v. Geis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Klehr v. Geis

160 N.W. 1033, 135 Minn. 475, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 558

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 8, 1916

DocketNos. 19,991—(128)

StatusPublished

This text of 160 N.W. 1033 (Klehr v. Geis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klehr v. Geis, 160 N.W. 1033, 135 Minn. 475, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 558 (Mich. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. Defendant had a verdict and plaintiff appealed from an order [476]*476denying a new trial. The only question presented is whether the verdict is manifestly against the evidence. We have read the record with care and find therein sufficient evidence to support the verdict, within the rule guiding us in such cases. A discussion of the evidence will serve no useful purpose.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. Defendant had a verdict and plaintiff appealed from an order [476]*476denying a new trial. The only question presented is whether the verdict is manifestly against the evidence. We have read the record with care and find therein sufficient evidence to support the verdict, within the rule guiding us in such cases. A discussion of the evidence will serve no useful purpose.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 N.W. 1033, 135 Minn. 475, 1916 Minn. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klehr-v-geis-minn-1916.