Klees's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Klees's Estate

63 Pa. Super. 202, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 136

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 8, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 27·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Kepiiart, J.,

Appellees moved to- quash this appeal because the assignments of error are in violation of Rule 14 of this court. These assignments are defective. The exceptions to the auditor’s report and the action of the court thereon are not set forth. The appeal should be quashed: Moore v. Bischoff, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 1. We have however, reviewed the case on its merits and find sufficient proof to sustain the decree of the court. The case is'in line with Ranninger’s App., 118 Pa. 20; Evans’ Est., 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 83; Davies Est., 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 360; Schreiber v. Northam, 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 483.

The appeal is dismissed at costs of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Kepiiart, J.,

Appellees moved to- quash this appeal because the assignments of error are in violation of Rule 14 of this court. These assignments are defective. The exceptions to the auditor’s report and the action of the court thereon are not set forth. The appeal should be quashed: Moore v. Bischoff, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 1. We have however, reviewed the case on its merits and find sufficient proof to sustain the decree of the court. The case is'in line with Ranninger’s App., 118 Pa. 20; Evans’ Est., 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 83; Davies Est., 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 360; Schreiber v. Northam, 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 483.

The appeal is dismissed at costs of appellants.

Klees's Estate, 63 Pa. Super. 202, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 136 (Pa. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

63 Pa. Super. 202 (Klees's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related